I've read this text three times in three separate classes, and my perspective changes with each reading. First read, I was a little confused by prose but ultimately inspired and hopeful. I saw no problem with the work. Second read, I was asked to read it with Lippman's "The Phantom Public." This gave Dewey's argument a new context, and I drifted a bit from his optimism. Third read, I'm tired of the argument. The America he talks is about only exists within the covers of his work. If this "Great Community" is possible -- why haven't we seen it yet? Both Lippman & Dewey wrote their works in the 20's. Dewey's ideal still hasn't come to fruition. I'd really like to embrace Dewey's work - but I need more. How will the great community happen? Yeah, you talk about "signs and symbols" enhancing communication -- but what do these "signs and symbols" look like? How will this work in the real world? And in a society with incredible medical and technological innovation, why can't we create the "signs and symbols" to make our Democracy work? I'm not sure it's possible.
That's why Lippmann makes sense to me. He talks about the public I see and interact with on a daily basis. He offers a realistic role for the public with tasks we can actually achieve. I also think his book was WAY more fun to read... but we won't factor that into the argument :)
After three readings, this is my stance. I'll update again if I go for number four!
0 comments:
Post a Comment